I’ve been lurking here for a while and I have a genuine question: what are we all doing here?
I don’t mean that dismissively. I find sisuon’s writings fascinating. But I’m starting to notice that different people seem to be getting very different things from these texts. Some are treating them as philosophy to analyze. Others seem to be… something more.
Is anyone else noticing this split? And does it matter?
honestly the first time i read this i thought it was just flowery nonsense but then i read it again and something clicked. still not sure i fully get it but the meta-stability in thought part definitely hits different on the second read.
Interesting take. I read it differently — I think attention as a resource is less about what you’re describing and more about the structural relationship between awareness and language. sisuon seems to be making a claim about the medium itself, not just the content.
But I could be wrong. The ambiguity might be intentional.